Argumentation for Practical Reasoning: An Axiomatic Approach

نویسنده

  • Phan Minh Dung
چکیده

An argument system could be viewed as a pair of a set of argument and a binary attack relation between arguments. The semantics of argumentation rests on the acceptability of arguments and the structure of arguments and their attack relations. While there is a relatively good understanding of the acceptability of arguments, the same can not be said about their structure and attack relations. In this paper, we present an axiomatic analysis of the attack relations of rule-based argument systems by presenting a set of simple and intuitive properties and showing that they indeed determine an uniquely defined common attack relations for rule-based argument systems.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

An Approach for Argumentation-based Reasoning Using Defeasible Logic in Multi-Agent Programming Languages

Argumentation systems are intimately related to nonmonotonic reasoning, of which defeasible reasoning is one widely-known approach. For example, the literature points out defeasible logic (a particular formalisation of defeasible reasoning) as a practical platform upon which to develop an argumentation system. In this paper, we develop an approach to endow AgentSpeak agents with argumentative c...

متن کامل

Practical argumentation semantics for socially efficient defeasible consequence

An abstract argumentation framework and the semantics, often called Dungean semantics, give a general framework for nonmonotonic logics. In the last fifteen years, a great number of papers in computational argumentation adopt Dungean semantics as a fundamental principle for evaluating various kinds of defeasible consequences. Recently, many papers address problems not only with theoretical reas...

متن کامل

Decision Support through Argumentation-Based Practical Reasoning

This extended research abstract describes an argumentation-based approach to modelling articulated decision making contexts. The approach encompasses a variety of argument and attack schemes aimed at representing basic knowledge and reasoning patterns for decision support.

متن کامل

Extension-Based Argumentation Semantics via Logic Programming Semantics with Negation as Failure

Extension-based argumentation semantics have been shown to be a suitable approach for performing practical reasoning. Since extension-based argumentation semantics were formalized in terms of relationships between atomic arguments, it has been shown that extension-based argumentation semantics (such as the grounded semantics and stable semantics) can be characterized by logic programming semant...

متن کامل

Argumentation-Based Reasoning Using Preferences over Sources of Information: (Extended Abstract)

Argumentation-based reasoning plays an important role in agent reasoning and communication. In this work, we extend an argumentation-based reasoning mechanism to take into account preferences over arguments supporting contrary conclusions. Such preferences come from elements that are present or can be more easily obtained in the context of practical multi-agent programming platforms, such as mu...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016